hot dog: be fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be fat 1.00
be high in fat 0.93
has lot of fat 0.91
be fatty 0.85
has many calorie but few vitamin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be fat)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fast food, be fatty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be fatty)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be fat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hot dog, be fat)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(hot dog, be fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)