hot dog: be high in fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, hot sauce
Weight: 0.35
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, soft drink
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in fat 1.00
be fat 0.93
has lot of fat 0.89
be fatty 0.80
has low calorific value 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has low calorific value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hot dog, be high in fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, has low calorific value)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fast food, be fatty)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has low calorific value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be fatty)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food, has low calorific value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(hot dog, be high in fat)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be fat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be fat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hot dog, be fat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(hot dog, be fat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hot dog, has lot of fat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(hot dog, has lot of fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(hot dog, be high in fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fast food, has low calorific value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(hot dog, be high in fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(fast food, has low calorific value)