hot dog: is dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal fat
Weight: 0.72
, fast food
Weight: 0.70
, favorite
Weight: 0.68
, junk food
Weight: 0.67
, item
Weight: 0.67
Siblings dog food
Weight: 0.38
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate bar
Weight: 0.34
, pizza
Weight: 0.34
, twinkies
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dogs 1.00
be called dogs 0.97
be bad for dogs 0.93
is best dogs 0.92
be called dog 0.91
called dog 0.91
be called hot dogs 0.90
be called hot dog 0.87
called hot dog 0.87
be named dog 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dog food, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(dog food, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(hot dog, is dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is best dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, called dog)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called dog)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, be named dog)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot dog, be bad for dogs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(hot dog, called dog)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(hot dog, called dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(hot dog, called dog)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(hot dog, be named dog)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called dog)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called dog)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be named dog)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(hot dog, called hot dog)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called dog)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called hot dogs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(hot dog, be called dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(hot dog, be called hot dog)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(hot dog, be named dog)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(hot dog, is best dogs)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hot dog, is best dogs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(hot dog, is best dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(hot dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(hot dog, is dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(dog food, be bad for dogs)