housekeeper: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.59
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, worker
Weight: 0.57
, position
Weight: 0.55
, family
Weight: 0.54
Siblings maid
Weight: 0.36
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, grandmother
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
get paid little 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(housekeeper, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(housekeeper, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid little)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(housekeeper, get paid little)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(housekeeper, get paid little)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid little)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(housekeeper, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)