housekeeper: get paid little

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.59
, woman
Weight: 0.59
, worker
Weight: 0.57
, position
Weight: 0.55
, family
Weight: 0.54
Siblings maid
Weight: 0.36
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, grandmother
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid little 1.00
get paid 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid little)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(worker, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(worker, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(worker, get paid)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(housekeeper, get paid little)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(housekeeper, get paid little)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(housekeeper, get paid)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(housekeeper, get paid)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid little)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(housekeeper, get paid little)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(housekeeper, get paid little)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(worker, get paid)