hunting: be to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to environment 1.00
be for environment 0.98
help environment 0.92
affect environment 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hunting, be to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(activity, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(activity, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fishing, be for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fishing, help environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fishing, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(activity, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(hunting, be to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fishing, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(fishing, affect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fishing, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(fishing, help environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(fishing, be for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fishing, be for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(hunting, be to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be for environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(hunting, affect environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(hunting, help environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hunting, help environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(hunting, affect environment)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(hunting, be to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fishing, affect environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fishing, help environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fishing, be for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(hunting, be to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(activity, affect environment)