hunting: is bad thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pursuit
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.61
, practice
Weight: 0.60
, activity
Weight: 0.60
, hobby
Weight: 0.57
Siblings archery
Weight: 0.36
, fishing
Weight: 0.34
, camping
Weight: 0.33
, business activity
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad thing 1.00
is thing 0.94
has quality bad 0.79
be wrong fun 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hunting, is bad thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hunting, is bad thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hunting, is bad thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sport, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hobby, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(practice, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sport, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(hobby, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(practice, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(archery, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(camping, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(practice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hunting, is bad thing)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hobby, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hunting, is bad thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(sport, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(hunting, is bad thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(camping, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(camping, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(archery, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(archery, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(fishing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fishing, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(hunting, is bad thing)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(hunting, be wrong fun)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(hunting, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(hunting, be wrong fun)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hunting, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hunting, be wrong fun)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(hunting, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hunting, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(hunting, be wrong fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hunting, is bad thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(camping, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fishing, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(archery, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sport, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hobby, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(hunting, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(practice, has quality bad)