illiteracy: be threat to unity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.66
, obstacle
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.56
Siblings inequality
Weight: 0.35
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.33
, hunger
Weight: 0.33
, overpopulation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be threat to unity 1.00
be threat to unity of country 0.98
is threat 0.83
be danger to democratic society 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(overpopulation, is threat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(overpopulation, is threat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be threat to unity)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity of country)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be danger to democratic society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illiteracy, be threat to unity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(illiteracy, be threat to unity)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(overpopulation, is threat)