:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(imac, get hot)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(laptop, run hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(imac, get hot)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(laptop, run hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer, get hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(laptop, run hot)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(computer, get hot)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(imac, get hot)
Similarity expansion
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(imac, run hot)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(imac, is hot)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(imac, run hot)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(imac, run hot)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(imac, run hot)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(imac, is hot)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(imac, is hot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(imac, is hot)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(imac, get hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(laptop, run hot)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer, get hot)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(laptop, run hot)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(imac, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer, get hot)