:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(computer, get hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(imac, is hot)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(laptop, run hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(imac, is hot)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(laptop, run hot)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(computer, get hot)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(laptop, run hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(computer, get hot)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(laptop, run hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(imac, is hot)
Salient implies Plausible
0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(imac, is hot)
Similarity expansion
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(imac, get hot)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(imac, get hot)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(imac, run hot)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(imac, get hot)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(imac, run hot)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(imac, run hot)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(imac, run hot)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(imac, get hot)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(imac, is hot)
Typical implies Plausible
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(imac, is hot)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(laptop, run hot)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer, get hot)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer, get hot)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(imac, is hot)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(laptop, run hot)