inclusion: be in workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.58
, topic
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
, characteristic
Weight: 0.55
, principle
Weight: 0.55
Siblings introduction
Weight: 0.33
, fairness
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, incorporation
Weight: 0.31
, switch
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.97
be in workplace important 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(fairness, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(fairness, be important in workplace)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(fairness, be important in workplace)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(inclusion, be in workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be important in workplace)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(inclusion, be important in workplace)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(inclusion, be important in workplace)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be important in workplace)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inclusion, be in workplace important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be in workplace important)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inclusion, be in workplace important)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(inclusion, be in workplace important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be in workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(inclusion, be in workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inclusion, be in workplace)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fairness, be important in workplace)