income: has quality asset

Related concepts

Parents	tax Weight: 0.64 , determinant Weight: 0.61 , allowance Weight: 0.61 , business activity Weight: 0.61
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.80 , operating expense Weight: 0.70 , unemployment Weight: 0.66 , poverty Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality asset	1.00
has quality good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(allowance, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(income, has quality asset)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(allowance, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(allowance, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality good)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(allowance, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(income, has quality asset)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(income tax, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality asset)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(operating expense, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(operating expense, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

Remarkable(income tax, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(income tax, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(income, has quality asset)

Similarity expansion

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(income, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(income, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(income, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(income, has quality asset)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(allowance, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality asset)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(income tax, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(operating expense, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.35

Typical(income, has quality asset) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(allowance, has quality good)