index: improve performance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reference
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.60
, variable
Weight: 0.60
Siblings measure
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.66
, temperature
Weight: 0.62
, index card
Weight: 0.59
, pointer
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve performance 1.00
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(index, improve performance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(index, improve performance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(index, improve performance)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(index, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(index, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(index, improve performance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(index, improve performance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(index, improve performance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)