indiana: be considered midwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered midwest 1.00
be in midwest 0.96
be called midwest 0.96
is midwest 0.96
be called heartland of america 0.78
heartland of america 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(illinois, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(illinois, is midwest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(illinois, is midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(illinois, be in midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is midwest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in midwest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be considered midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be called midwest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(illinois, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(illinois, is midwest)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ohio, is midwest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, is midwest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, be in midwest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in midwest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called midwest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(michigan, be called midwest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(michigan, be called midwest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(missouri, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(missouri, be considered midwest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(indiana, be in midwest)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(indiana, be in midwest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be in midwest)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(indiana, is midwest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(indiana, be in midwest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(indiana, is midwest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called midwest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(indiana, be called midwest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(indiana, is midwest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(indiana, be called midwest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called midwest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is midwest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(indiana, heartland of america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(indiana, be called heartland of america)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(indiana, heartland of america)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called heartland of america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(indiana, heartland of america)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(indiana, be called heartland of america)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called heartland of america)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(indiana, heartland of america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illinois, is midwest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(illinois, be in midwest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(michigan, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(michigan, be called midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ohio, is midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(missouri, be considered midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ohio, be called midwest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illinois, is midwest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(illinois, be in midwest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(indiana, be considered midwest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest)