ohio: be considered midwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered midwest 1.00
be considered part of midwest 0.98
be in midwest 0.96
be called midwest 0.96
is midwest 0.96
be part of midwest 0.96
is midwestern state 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be called midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(illinois, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(illinois, is midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(illinois, is midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(illinois, be in midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is midwest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be considered midwest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be in midwest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be called midwest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is midwest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, be considered midwest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be called midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(illinois, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(illinois, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(illinois, is midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(iowa, is midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(iowa, is midwest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(cleveland, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cleveland, be considered midwest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ohio, be considered midwest)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, is midwest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, be in midwest)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ohio, be in midwest)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(ohio, is midwest)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(ohio, is midwest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is midwest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be in midwest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(ohio, be called midwest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called midwest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ohio, be called midwest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ohio, is midwestern state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, is midwestern state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered part of midwest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(ohio, is midwestern state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered part of midwest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered part of midwest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is midwestern state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(ohio, be considered part of midwest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illinois, is midwest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(illinois, be in midwest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(iowa, is midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(cleveland, be considered midwest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(illinois, is midwest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(illinois, be in midwest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(illinois, be considered midwest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest)