wisconsin: be considered midwest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered midwest 1.00
be in midwest 0.96
be called midwest 0.96
be called america 's dairyland 0.76
is america 's dairyland 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be called midwest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ohio, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(ohio, be considered midwest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(ohio, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(ohio, be in midwest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(michigan, be in midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(michigan, be in midwest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(ohio, be called midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called midwest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(michigan, be called midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(michigan, be called midwest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be in midwest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be called midwest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be called america 's dairyland)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is america 's dairyland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wisconsin, be considered midwest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(michigan, be in midwest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(michigan, be called midwest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be in midwest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ohio, be called midwest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, be considered midwest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ohio, be considered midwest)