inflation: be harmful to economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rate
Weight: 0.68
, issue
Weight: 0.64
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, interest rate
Weight: 0.61
, concern
Weight: 0.60
Siblings crisis
Weight: 0.33
, index
Weight: 0.33
, inequality
Weight: 0.32
, sector
Weight: 0.32
, housing
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to economy 1.00
affect economy 0.90
be important to economy 0.89
be in economy 0.89
be bad for economy 0.88
be important for economy 0.88
be good for economy 0.87
be helpful for economy 0.87
help economy 0.86
hurt economy 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rate, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(interest rate, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest rate, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(interest rate, affect economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(interest rate, be important to economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(rate, be bad for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rate, be bad for economy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, be important to economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(interest rate, affect economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sector, be in economy)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(housing, hurt economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important to economy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(rate, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(interest rate, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(interest rate, affect economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sector, be in economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sector, be in economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(inequality, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(inequality, be good for economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sector, be important to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(housing, hurt economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(housing, hurt economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be bad for economy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be good for economy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(inflation, be in economy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(inflation, affect economy)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be in economy)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be helpful for economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be important for economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(inflation, be good for economy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(inflation, be bad for economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(inflation, be in economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(inflation, affect economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(inflation, hurt economy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(inflation, be in economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(inflation, affect economy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(inflation, affect economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(inflation, be good for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(inflation, be helpful for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(inflation, be bad for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(inflation, hurt economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(inflation, be important for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(inflation, hurt economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(inflation, be good for economy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(inflation, be bad for economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(inflation, be helpful for economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(inflation, be important for economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(inflation, hurt economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(inflation, be helpful for economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(inflation, be important for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(interest rate, affect economy)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest rate, be important to economy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rate, be bad for economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, be in economy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inequality, be good for economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(housing, hurt economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(interest rate, affect economy)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(interest rate, be important to economy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(inflation, be harmful to economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(rate, be bad for economy)