influenza: be considered infection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents virus
Weight: 0.76
, pathogen
Weight: 0.68
, infection
Weight: 0.67
, disease
Weight: 0.66
, vaccine
Weight: 0.66
Siblings flu
Weight: 0.39
, chickenpox
Weight: 0.39
, smallpox
Weight: 0.38
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, computer virus
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered infection 1.00
be considered serious infection 0.94
is zoonotic disease 0.81
is communicable disease 0.80
has state virus 0.79
be active virus 0.79
is active virus 0.79
has state disease 0.79
be called influenza 0.78
is emerging disease 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(smallpox, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state virus)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(chickenpox, is communicable disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(chickenpox, is communicable disease)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, is communicable disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(smallpox, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(smallpox, has state disease)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chickenpox, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(flu, has state disease)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(flu, has state disease)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(flu, has state virus)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(flu, has state virus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(influenza, be considered infection)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered serious infection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(influenza, be considered serious infection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(influenza, be called influenza)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state virus)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be active virus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is active virus)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(influenza, be called influenza)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(influenza, be called influenza)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(influenza, has state disease)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is communicable disease)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be called influenza)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(influenza, is active virus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(influenza, has state virus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(influenza, be active virus)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(influenza, is zoonotic disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(influenza, be considered serious infection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(influenza, is emerging disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(influenza, is active virus)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(influenza, is active virus)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(influenza, be active virus)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state virus)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(influenza, be active virus)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(influenza, be considered serious infection)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(influenza, has state disease)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(influenza, has state virus)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(influenza, be considered infection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(chickenpox, is communicable disease)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(smallpox, has state disease)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chickenpox, has state disease)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(flu, has state disease)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, be considered infection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(flu, has state virus)