inhibition: has quality system

Related concepts

Parents	process Weight: 0.51 , thing Weight: 0.51 , aspect Weight: 0.43 , problem Weight: 0.42
Siblings	phagocytosis Weight: 0.33 , apoptosis Weight: 0.33 , oxidative phosphorylation Weight: 0.33 , hydrolysis Weight: 0.32 , metabolism Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality system	1.00
be important in system	0.86
has quality good	0.84
has quality bad	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(inhibition, has quality system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(apoptosis, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(inhibition, has quality system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(phagocytosis, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(metabolism, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(metabolism, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(metabolism, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(apoptosis, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(apoptosis, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(inhibition, has quality system)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality good)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, be important in system)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(inhibition, be important in system)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(inhibition, be important in system)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(inhibition, be important in system)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(inhibition, has quality good)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(inhibition, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(inhibition, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(inhibition, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(inhibition, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(inhibition, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.39

Salient(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(inhibition, has quality system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(phagocytosis, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(metabolism, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(apoptosis, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(inhibition, has quality system) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)