insulation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.58
, measure
Weight: 0.57
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings exhaust pipe
Weight: 0.58
, steel wool
Weight: 0.34
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.34
, drywall
Weight: 0.33
, flooring
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(drywall, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(drywall, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(drywall, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(aluminum foil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(insulation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(insulation, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(insulation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(insulation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(insulation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(drywall, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(insulation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, has quality bad)