integrated circuit: be important to development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.59
, product
Weight: 0.51
Siblings circuit breaker
Weight: 0.39
, network device
Weight: 0.36
, module
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.34
, computer network
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to development 1.00
be important to development of computers 0.84
be important for business 0.79
be important to business 0.78
be important in marketing 0.78
be important in life 0.76
be important in application 0.76
be most important element of marketing mix 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(product, be most important element of marketing mix) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(product, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(circuit, be important to development of computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be important to business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(product, be important for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(product, be most important element of marketing mix)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(product, be important for business)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(computer network, be important in life)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(diode, be important in application)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(product, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(product, be most important element of marketing mix) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(circuit, be important to development of computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(computer network, be important in life) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(computer network, be important in life)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(diode, be important in application) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(diode, be important in application)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, be important to development)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(integrated circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development of computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(product, be most important element of marketing mix)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(computer network, be important in life)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(diode, be important in application)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(circuit, be important to development of computers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(integrated circuit, be important to development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(product, be most important element of marketing mix)