product: be important to business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.85
, niche
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.62
, marketplace
Weight: 0.61
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.70
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, potato chip
Weight: 0.68
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.67
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to business 1.00
be important in business 0.99
be important for business 0.99
be important in 1853 0.82
be important in marketing 0.80
is profitable 0.78
be profitable 0.77
be important in marketing mix 0.76
be important to community structure 0.75
be most important element of marketing mix 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(niche, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(search engine, is profitable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(search engine, be profitable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(niche, be important to community structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(niche, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(niche, be important to community structure)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(search engine, is profitable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(search engine, be profitable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important in business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important to community structure)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(search engine, is profitable)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(search engine, be profitable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, be important in 1853)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(niche, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(search engine, is profitable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be important to business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(search engine, be profitable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be important to business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(niche, be important to community structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(potato chip, be important in 1853) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato chip, be important in 1853)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(product, be important to business)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(product, be important for business)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(product, be important for business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(product, be important for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(product, be important in marketing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing mix)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(niche, be important to community structure)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(search engine, be profitable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(search engine, is profitable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato chip, be important in 1853)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(niche, be important to community structure)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(search engine, is profitable)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(product, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(search engine, be profitable)