integration: be critical to practice of project management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, service
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, migration
Weight: 0.33
, separation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical to practice of project management 1.00
be critical to practice 0.88
be essential field of study 0.76
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(service, be essential field of study)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(service, be essential field of study)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(operation, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(operation, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(service, be essential field of study)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(service, be essential field of study)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(operation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(integration, be critical to practice of project management)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(integration, be critical to practice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(integration, be critical to practice)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(integration, be important in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(integration, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(integration, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be essential field of study)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be essential field of study)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(integration, be critical to practice of project management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(operation, be important in business)