integration: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, service
Weight: 0.63
, operation
Weight: 0.62
, function
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.60
Siblings internet service provider
Weight: 0.33
, security system
Weight: 0.33
, operating system
Weight: 0.33
, migration
Weight: 0.33
, separation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
is damn hard 0.82
has quality good 0.78
is done 0.76
be like ridejoy 0.76
be like zimride 0.76
be like gobutler 0.76
is important brainly 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(integration, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(separation, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(separation, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(migration, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(security system, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(migration, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(migration, is good thing)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(separation, is done)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(migration, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(integration, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(migration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(migration, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(migration, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(migration, is thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(separation, is done) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(separation, is done)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(separation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(separation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(migration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(migration, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(security system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(operating system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(migration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(migration, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(separation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(separation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(security system, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(security system, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(integration, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(integration, is thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(integration, is thing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(integration, is thing)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(integration, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(integration, is damn hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(integration, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(integration, is important brainly)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(integration, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(integration, is damn hard)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(integration, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(integration, is important brainly)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(integration, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(integration, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(integration, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(integration, is damn hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(integration, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(integration, is important brainly)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(integration, is damn hard)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(integration, is important brainly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(integration, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(migration, is thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(separation, is done)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(migration, is good thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(separation, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(separation, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(migration, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(security system, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(migration, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(security system, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(integration, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)