interpretation: play role in development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, regulation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings belief
Weight: 0.64
, conclusion
Weight: 0.61
, translation
Weight: 0.60
, contradiction
Weight: 0.60
, definition
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
play role in development 1.00
play role 0.95
play role in development of christianity 0.91
be important for development meritnation 0.84
be important for development 0.84
play 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(interpretation, play role in development)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(interpretation, play role in development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(translation, play role)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play role in development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play role in development)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(translation, play role) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(translation, play role)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(interpretation, play role in development)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(interpretation, play)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development of christianity)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(interpretation, play)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(interpretation, play role in development of christianity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(interpretation, play role in development of christianity)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(interpretation, play role in development of christianity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(interpretation, play role in development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(translation, play role)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(interpretation, play role in development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)