investment: be regarded as current assets

Related concepts

Parents	financial institution Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.61 , strategy Weight: 0.58 , concept Weight: 0.58
Siblings	savings account Weight: 0.67 , currency Weight: 0.62 , purchase Weight: 0.61 , stock Weight: 0.61 , advertising Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be regarded as current assets	1.00
be regarded as assets	0.97
be considered assets	0.93
be considered liquid assets	0.88
has quality assets	0.86
compare to assets	0.84
compare to other assets	0.84
be considered investment	0.81
has quality asset	0.80
share of is asset	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(stock, be considered liquid assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(stock, be considered liquid assets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(investment, be regarded as current assets)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality assets)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(investment, has quality assets)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(investment, has quality asset)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.05

Typical(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(investment, has quality asset)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality assets)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(investment, has quality assets)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(investment, has quality asset)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(investment, has quality asset)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Salient(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Plausible(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(investment, be regarded as current assets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(investment, be regarded as current assets) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(stock, be considered liquid assets)