ipa: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beer
Weight: 0.55
, style
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, standard
Weight: 0.43
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, ping pong
Weight: 0.31
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste good 0.97
taste like weed 0.82
taste like soap 0.81
has quality bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
taste like testicles 0.79
taste like grapefruit 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beer, taste bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(thing, taste bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(style, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ipa, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ipa, taste like weed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste like weed)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ipa, taste good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ipa, taste like grapefruit)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ipa, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)