ipa: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents beer
Weight: 0.55
, style
Weight: 0.51
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, standard
Weight: 0.43
Siblings guinness
Weight: 0.32
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.31
, ping pong
Weight: 0.31
, bittorrent
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste bad 0.97
taste like weed 0.83
taste like soap 0.82
taste like grapefruit 0.79
has quality good 0.79
taste like testicles 0.78
has quality bad 0.77
has sweetness sweet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(beer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beer, taste bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(thing, taste bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(style, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(style, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(standard, has quality good)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(beer, taste bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(beer, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(style, has quality good)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(guinness, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(thing, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(beer, taste bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(beer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(standard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(style, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste good)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ping pong, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ping pong, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(guinness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(guinness, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ipa, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(ipa, taste bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ipa, taste bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ipa, taste bad)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(ipa, taste like weed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste bad)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(ipa, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(guinness, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(ping pong, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(beer, taste bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, taste bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(style, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(standard, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(ipa, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(style, has quality bad)
...