iron ore: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ore
Weight: 0.89
, raw material
Weight: 0.71
, mineral
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.69
, cargo
Weight: 0.68
Siblings hematite
Weight: 0.61
, sulfide
Weight: 0.40
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.39
, sulphide
Weight: 0.39
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
be of high quality 0.86
has quality making 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
has shape solid 0.79
has quality resource 0.79
be improved by technology more durable than original 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
contribute to good health 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has shape solid)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(iron oxide, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(material, be improved by technology more durable than original) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has shape solid)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(iron oxide, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iron oxide, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(iron ore, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has shape solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(iron oxide, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(iron ore, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(material, be improved by technology more durable than original)