ore: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.56
, rock
Weight: 0.53
Siblings iron ore
Weight: 0.89
, sulfide
Weight: 0.77
, coal
Weight: 0.62
, galena
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is non-renewable resource 0.94
has quality resources 0.91
be used as resource 0.90
be considered resources 0.81
is non resources 0.80
is renewable resources 0.77
is non renewable resources 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ore, be used as resource)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ore, be used as resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ore, be used as resource)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ore, be used as resource)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)