ore: is non-renewable resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.56
, rock
Weight: 0.53
Siblings iron ore
Weight: 0.89
, sulfide
Weight: 0.77
, coal
Weight: 0.62
, galena
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non-renewable resource 1.00
has quality resource 0.94
be used as resource 0.94
be considered resources 0.84
has quality resources 0.82
is non resources 0.82
is renewable resources 0.79
is non renewable resources 0.78
be considered nonrenewable resources 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ore, be used as resource)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ore, be used as resource)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ore, be used as resource)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ore, be used as resource)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)