ore: has quality resources

Related concepts

Parents	material Weight: 0.66 , mineral Weight: 0.66 , raw material Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.56 , rock Weight: 0.53
Siblings	iron ore Weight: 0.89 , sulfide Weight: 0.77 , coal Weight: 0.62 , galena Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality resources	1.00
has quality resource	0.91
be considered resources	0.89
is non resources	0.88
is renewable resources	0.83
is non-renewable resource	0.82
is non renewable resources	0.81
be considered nonrenewable resources	0.78
be used as resource	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(ore, be used as resource)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(ore, has quality resource)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(ore, be used as resource)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(ore, be used as resource)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(ore, be used as resource)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(ore, has quality resources) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)