ore: is renewable resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.56
, rock
Weight: 0.53
Siblings iron ore
Weight: 0.89
, sulfide
Weight: 0.77
, coal
Weight: 0.62
, galena
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is renewable resources 1.00
is non renewable resources 0.97
is renewable 0.94
is renewable sources 0.90
is non renewable sources 0.88
be considered nonrenewable resources 0.85
is non resources 0.84
be considered resources 0.83
has quality resources 0.83
is non-renewable resource 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coal, is renewable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coal, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(coal, is renewable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coal, is renewable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iron ore, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)