ore: is renewable sources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.56
, rock
Weight: 0.53
Siblings iron ore
Weight: 0.89
, sulfide
Weight: 0.77
, coal
Weight: 0.62
, galena
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is renewable sources 1.00
is non renewable sources 0.98
is renewable 0.93
is renewable resources 0.90
is non renewable resources 0.89
is sources 0.87
is non sources 0.84
be considered nonrenewable resources 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable sources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(resource, is renewable)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(coal, is renewable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(resource, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(coal, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(coal, is renewable)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(iron ore, is renewable)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is renewable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable sources)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(ore, is sources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable sources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(ore, is non sources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ore, is sources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non sources)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ore, is sources)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(ore, is non sources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ore, is non sources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ore, is sources)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable sources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(coal, is renewable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(iron ore, is renewable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ore, is renewable sources)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(resource, is renewable)