ore: is non resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.66
, mineral
Weight: 0.66
, raw material
Weight: 0.62
, resource
Weight: 0.56
, rock
Weight: 0.53
Siblings iron ore
Weight: 0.89
, sulfide
Weight: 0.77
, coal
Weight: 0.62
, galena
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
is non resources 1.00
is non renewable resources 0.90
be considered resources 0.90
has quality resources 0.88
is renewable resources 0.84
is non 0.83
is non-renewable resource 0.82
be considered nonrenewable resources 0.81
has quality resource 0.80
be used as resource 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(resource, has quality resource)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(resource, has quality resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(resource, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ore, is non resources)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(ore, be used as resource)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ore, is non)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(ore, is non)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ore, be used as resource)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(ore, is renewable resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, is non renewable resources)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ore, is non)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resources)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(ore, is non-renewable resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ore, be considered resources)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ore, is renewable resources)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(ore, be used as resource)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resources)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ore, is renewable resources)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resources)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ore, is renewable resources)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resources)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ore, has quality resource)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered nonrenewable resources)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ore, be used as resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(resource, has quality resource)