iron ore: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ore
Weight: 0.89
, raw material
Weight: 0.71
, mineral
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.69
, cargo
Weight: 0.68
Siblings hematite
Weight: 0.61
, sulfide
Weight: 0.40
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.39
, sulphide
Weight: 0.39
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
is important resources 0.84
is nonrenewale resources 0.83
is important natural resources 0.82
is natural resources 0.82
be natural resource of carolina 0.81
be considered resources 0.81
be called resources 0.81
is non resources 0.80
is nonrenewable resource 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(mineral, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ore, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(ore, is non resources)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(ore, be considered resources)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ore, is non resources)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(ore, has quality resource)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, has quality resource)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(ore, be considered resources)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(mineral, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(ore, be considered resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(ore, is non resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(iron ore, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(iron ore, is nonrenewable resource)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(iron ore, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mineral, has quality resource)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(ore, has quality resource)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ore, be considered resources)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(iron ore, has quality resource) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ore, is non resources)