isolation: be important for speciation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, method
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
Siblings loneliness
Weight: 0.34
, alienation
Weight: 0.33
, boredom
Weight: 0.33
, stigma
Weight: 0.33
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for speciation 1.00
be involved in speciation 0.97
required for speciation 0.97
relate to speciation 0.97
be involves in speciation 0.92
lead to evolutionary changes in animal species 0.80
lead to evolutionary changes 0.77
be important in evolution 0.77
cause species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(isolation, be involves in speciation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, be involves in speciation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be involves in speciation)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, be involved in speciation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(isolation, be involves in speciation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(isolation, relate to speciation)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(isolation, required for speciation)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(isolation, required for speciation)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(isolation, required for speciation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes in animal species)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(isolation, be important in evolution)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(isolation, lead to evolutionary changes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(isolation, required for speciation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(isolation, cause species)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(isolation, cause species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(isolation, cause species)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(isolation, cause species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(isolation, be important for speciation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(isolation, be important for speciation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(isolation, be important for speciation)