jackal: has physical part ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, scavenger
Weight: 0.60
, creature
Weight: 0.59
, beast
Weight: 0.55
Siblings bengal tiger
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, fox
Weight: 0.36
, hyena
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part ears 1.00
have big ears 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(hyena, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(hyena, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hyena, has physical part ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(fox, have big ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(jackal, has physical part ears)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, have big ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(jackal, have big ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(jackal, have big ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(jackal, have big ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(jackal, has physical part ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(hyena, has physical part ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(jackal, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(fox, have big ears)