japanese restaurant: be used to prepare food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, bar
Weight: 0.64
, japan
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, everything
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to prepare food 1.00
be used to food 0.85
be used to eat food 0.85
be at food 0.83
create pre-made food 0.82
be used to eat tasty food 0.80
be used to eat meal without cook 0.79
be used to eat in 0.79
be used to prepare and provide french cuisine 0.79
be used to eat raviolli 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(restaurant, create pre-made food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(restaurant, create pre-made food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, create pre-made food)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to prepare and provide french cuisine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(restaurant, create pre-made food)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be at food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to prepare and provide french cuisine)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to prepare and provide french cuisine)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(restaurant, create pre-made food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be at food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to prepare and provide french cuisine)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat tasty food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to prepare food)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(restaurant, create pre-made food)