johnson: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.63
, friend
Weight: 0.60
, candidate
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.60
, guy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings michael jackson
Weight: 0.37
, john smith
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
was great 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(johnson, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(johnson, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(johnson, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(friend, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(johnson, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(michael jackson, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(johnson, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(johnson, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(johnson, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(johnson, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(johnson, was great)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(johnson, was great)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(johnson, was great)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(johnson, was great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(johnson, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(michael jackson, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(johnson, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)