journalist: be called hack

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.72
, politician
Weight: 0.70
, observer
Weight: 0.68
, reporter
Weight: 0.56
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.66
, photographer
Weight: 0.64
, publisher
Weight: 0.61
, diplomat
Weight: 0.55
, film maker
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called hack 1.00
be called hacks 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hack)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(reporter, be called hacks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(reporter, be called hacks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(journalist, be called hack)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(journalist, be called hack)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(journalist, be called hacks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hacks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(journalist, be called hacks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hack)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hack)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(journalist, be called hack) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)