journalist: be called hacks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.72
, politician
Weight: 0.70
, observer
Weight: 0.68
, reporter
Weight: 0.56
Siblings editor
Weight: 0.66
, photographer
Weight: 0.64
, publisher
Weight: 0.61
, diplomat
Weight: 0.55
, film maker
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called hacks 1.00
be called hack 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hacks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(reporter, be called hacks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(reporter, be called hacks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(reporter, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(journalist, be called hacks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(journalist, be called hacks)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(journalist, be called hack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(journalist, be called hack)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hack)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(journalist, be called hacks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(journalist, be called hacks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(reporter, be called hacks)