junk: be at fast-food restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents file
Weight: 0.51
, issue
Weight: 0.51
, folder
Weight: 0.49
, email
Weight: 0.48
, item
Weight: 0.48
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.31
, trash can
Weight: 0.31
, trash
Weight: 0.31
, computer file
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at fast-food restaurant 1.00
be at restaurant 1.00
be at hotel 0.80
be at store 0.77
be at kitchen 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(item, be at store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(trash, be at kitchen)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(trash can, be at kitchen)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(item, be at store)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(trash, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(trash, be at hotel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(trash can, be at hotel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at hotel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(garbage can, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(garbage can, be at kitchen)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(trash can, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(trash can, be at kitchen)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(trash can, be at restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at hotel)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(trash, be at hotel)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(garbage can, be at kitchen)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(trash can, be at kitchen)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(junk, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(item, be at store)