keeping: be bad in zoos

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents idiot
Weight: 0.31
, training
Weight: 0.31
, challenge
Weight: 0.30
, property
Weight: 0.30
, commitment
Weight: 0.30
Siblings finding
Weight: 0.25
, anything
Weight: 0.24
, set
Weight: 0.24
, new job
Weight: 0.24
, motivation
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad in zoos 1.00
be wrong in zoos 0.96
be cruel in zoos 0.94
be in zoo 0.84
be in zoo cruel 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(keeping, be in zoo)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(keeping, be in zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)