keeping: be in zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents idiot
Weight: 0.31
, training
Weight: 0.31
, challenge
Weight: 0.30
, property
Weight: 0.30
, commitment
Weight: 0.30
Siblings finding
Weight: 0.25
, anything
Weight: 0.24
, set
Weight: 0.24
, new job
Weight: 0.24
, motivation
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in zoo 1.00
be in zoo cruel 0.90
be bad in zoos 0.84
be wrong in zoos 0.82
be cruel in zoos 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(keeping, be in zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be wrong in zoos)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo)