keeping: be in zoo cruel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents idiot
Weight: 0.31
, training
Weight: 0.31
, challenge
Weight: 0.30
, property
Weight: 0.30
, commitment
Weight: 0.30
Siblings finding
Weight: 0.25
, anything
Weight: 0.24
, set
Weight: 0.24
, new job
Weight: 0.24
, motivation
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in zoo cruel 1.00
be cruel in zoos 0.92
be in zoo 0.90
be cruel in cages 0.85
be in captivity cruel 0.85
be bad in zoos 0.83
be wrong in zoos 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be cruel in cages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(keeping, be cruel in cages)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(keeping, be cruel in cages)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in captivity cruel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(keeping, be in captivity cruel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(keeping, be in captivity cruel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(keeping, be cruel in cages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(keeping, be cruel in zoos)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(keeping, be in captivity cruel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(keeping, be bad in zoos)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(keeping, be in zoo)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(keeping, be wrong in zoos)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(keeping, be in zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(keeping, be in zoo cruel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(keeping, be in zoo cruel)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(keeping, be in zoo cruel)