keyboard: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.67
, musical instrument
Weight: 0.63
, device
Weight: 0.62
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.61
, instrument
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.79
, computer mouse
Weight: 0.67
, harpsichord
Weight: 0.56
, xylophone
Weight: 0.52
, crt
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
be better making 0.81
be any better 0.78
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(instrument, be better making)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(instrument, be better making)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(instrument, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(crt, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crt, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crt, be any better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(instrument, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(instrument, be better making)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(crt, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(crt, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(crt, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(crt, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(crt, be any better)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(crt, be any better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(keyboard, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(keyboard, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(keyboard, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(keyboard, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(crt, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(crt, be any better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(crt, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(instrument, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(keyboard, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(instrument, be better making)