king: be chosen in saudi arabia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents monarch
Weight: 0.79
, ruler
Weight: 0.72
, legend
Weight: 0.67
, queen
Weight: 0.66
, leader
Weight: 0.66
Siblings tyrant
Weight: 0.57
, queen elizabeth
Weight: 0.38
, stephen king
Weight: 0.38
, prince
Weight: 0.37
, god
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be chosen in saudi arabia 1.00
were selected in egypt 0.83
were selected in ancient israel 0.81
were selscted in egypt 0.77
be in ancient egypt called 0.77
were in scotland chosen 11th century 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in egypt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(king, were selected in egypt)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(king, were selected in egypt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(king, were selected in egypt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(king, were selected in ancient israel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(king, were selscted in egypt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(king, were selected in ancient israel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(king, be chosen in saudi arabia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(leader, be chosen in saudi arabia)