:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lab, has state pets)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lab, has state pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lab, has state pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lab, has state pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lab, is dogs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(lab, has state pets)
⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lab, is dogs)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lab, has state pets)
⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child