lab: make pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents room
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.56
Siblings clean room
Weight: 0.33
, hotel room
Weight: 0.33
, common room
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
make pets 1.00
make good pets 0.97
is good pets 0.95
has state pets 0.93
is dogs 0.85
make service dogs 0.84
is good dogs 0.83
make good service dogs 0.83
is best dogs 0.80
is popular dogs 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lab, make pets)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lab, make pets)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lab, make pets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lab, make pets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, make good pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has state pets)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, make good pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has state pets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make pets)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lab, make pets)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, make good pets)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lab, make pets)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has state pets)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lab, make pets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(lab, make pets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(lab, make pets)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lab, make good pets)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lab, is dogs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(lab, make good pets)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lab, has state pets)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lab, make good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(lab, make good pets)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lab, has state pets)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lab, is dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lab, make good service dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(lab, make good service dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lab, has state pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lab, has state pets)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lab, make good service dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lab, make good service dogs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(lab, is dogs)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(lab, is dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(lab, make pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make pets)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, make good pets)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has state pets)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(lab, make pets)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)